FYC: Meryl Streep for 'Best Actress in a Leading Role' at the 82nd Academy Awards 2010 - Unofficial support site -



Thursday, March 4, 2010

Win or lose, Streep is class act and actress

Win or lose, Streep is class act and actress 

Meryl Streep may not win the Oscar this weekend because she's too ... brilliant. Too unbelievably talented, an actress who can do anything or disappear into anyone, from a drunk ("Ironweed") and dying wife and mother ("One True Thing") to a frosty fashion editor ("The Devil Wears Prada").


She is like the A-plus student who excels at everything she tackles and who is expected to be at the top of the class -- because she is Meryl Streep. She can meet and master any challenge, perfect any accent and appear to transform herself, no matter what the role demands.

As John F. Kennedy once said, "To whom much is given, much is required." Much has been given to Ms. Streep and much is required and, often, taken for granted.

Of course she can play Julia Child, even if that means creating the illusion that she's 6 foot 2, with a thicker midsection, curly brown hair, a lower voice and the ability to be moved almost to tears by superb food. She did just that in "Julie & Julia."

A judgmental nun? Been there, done that in "Doubt."
Divorced mother teaching violin to children in East Harlem? "Music of the Heart."
Blue-collar heroine whose battle for truth exacts the highest price? "Silkwood."

And the list goes on, all the way back to "The Deer Hunter" (1978) when she received her first Oscar nomination, and "Kramer vs. Kramer" (1979), when she won for the first time, in the supporting race. "Holy mackerel!" she exclaimed, from the podium of the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion.

Ms. Streep's second win, this time for leading actress, came in "Sophie's Choice" as a Polish concentration camp survivor who had faced a question about her children that was the embodiment of evil. When Sylvester Stallone opened the envelope on April 11, 1983, he announced her as "Marvelous Meryl Streep."

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Crazy but True: Meryl Streep Hasn't Won an Oscar in 26 Years. Why Not?


Crazy but True: Meryl Streep Hasn't Won an Oscar in 26 Years. Why Not?


Febr 28, 2009 moviefone.com

It's hard to believe, but Meryl Streep, arguably America's most acclaimed actress, has not won an Academy Award since 1983, when she took home the Best Actress trophy for 'Sophie's Choice.' (Three years earlier she nabbed her first Oscar for her supporting role in 'Kramer vs. Kramer.'

That's a grand total of two wins -- and only one for a leading role -- in her entire 32-year movie career, despite having been nominated 15 times. (For some perspective: Sally Field and Hilary Swankboth won the Best Actress award twice.) Streep's current and 16th nomination is for her delicious portrayal of Julia Child in'Julie & Julia.' Will she lose out yet again?

Judging from past years ... it's a distinct possibility. Winning an Oscar, of course, is all about who else is in the running that particular year. In addition to other disadvantages, which are detailed below, Streep has had the misfortune to be nominated repeatedly alongside actresses who not only gave outstanding performances, but whose "Time Had Come" to win. When the Academy, like God, decides that it's someone's time, there's no getting around it.

"2010
• 
Is Nominated for: 'Julie & Julia'
• 
Fellow Nominees: Sandra Bullock ('The Blind Side'), Helen Mirren ('The Last Station'), Carey Mulligan ('An Education'), Gabourey Sidibe ('Precious')
• 
Streep's Chances: Her toughest competition is Mirren (stunning as Countess Tolstoy) and Bullock (who's never been nominated before), but the Academy might decide that 26 years of showing up and graciously applauding her fellow nominees is long enough. Maybe Streep's time has finally come ... again". 

Let's break it down by year of nomination (all for Best Actress unless otherwise stipulated; winners are in bold): Continue reading after the cut: